Helloooooooo !!
> If you ever change a filebfrom Python to Cython for no clear good reason, I
> will be very annoyed.
Well, the point's always to be able to rewrite code more efficiently :-p
> One should always use Python instead of Cython unless
> there is a clear compelling reason not to.
Really ? O_o
> - takes a long time to compile
Come ooooooon ! Half a second when you rebuild Sage !!! How bad can that be ?
> - is much harder to interactively debug sunce you can't run python code in
> the stackframe's context (yet)
Hmmm... O_O;;;
I have no idea what the stackframe's context could be O_o
> - requires more knowledge for devs to use thus reducing the maintainability
> of sage
To add perhaps, because of the module_list file, but why would it be harder to maintain ? The procedure is the same, a sage -b and you are done, aren't you ?
> - is not always faster than pure python
? On which codes can it be slower ?
> - does not support 100% of Python language features
Arg ! And what is missing then ?
Thaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanks !!!
Nathann --
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
สมัครสมาชิก:
ส่งความคิดเห็น (Atom)
0 ความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น